Sunday, March 12, 2006

Two Trees

In the story of Adam and Eve in the Book of Genesis, the J editor offers us an "explanation" for the problem of sin and sinfulness. He offers it to us in the form of an allegory, which of course is upsetting to those who would wish the story to be literally true. However, having said that, there is much truth contained in the story, especially regarding the sin, the famous original sin, which is symbolized by the action of eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Woven into the infamous story of humanity's fall is the obvious theological explanation by the J source of the "problem of sin." However, I submit that the story also foreshadows the end of history. Why would the end be found in a story about the beginning of creation? First, because any good story teller will hint at the climax in the beginning of the story, in order to keep the reader interested. Also, all scripture is prophetic and the famous story of the fall of our first parents offers clues for future generations on the plan that God has for overcoming the problem of sin, and how God plans on saving the human race from complete destruction because of its new found power. Of course, like most scripture, this meaning is "hidden" in the sense that you can only understand it if you are willing to accept it as it is, and not try to justify your own religious beliefs by reading them into the text. As a result, this essay will attempt to show how the eating of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was obscured so that we could fully understand it only during our time, the time when the "error" of our first parents will run its course, and God would correct the mistake of sin. In doing so, I will compare the two trees, the tree of life, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and show how they are archetypes of the struggle between human reason and human spirit.

Adam and Eve

According to the story, Adam is made from the dust of the earth, (his name literally translated is "earth-person"), that is he has a material or physical body. What makes Adam different from the other physical creatures(animals and plants) is that God breathes into Adam's nostrils, making Adam a "living soul." This implys two things: 1. intimacy(you must get close to someone to breathe in their nose) and 2. Adam is like the "sons of god" (angels) in that Adam has soul or spirit, making Adam both matter and soul, body, mind and spirit. Adam is unique; the point by which the spirit of God makes its way directly into our dimension, the dimension of matter. The sons of god have the ability to dwell in this realm as well, however they are not made "of the dust of the earth;" they are pure energy, pure spirit. Therefore, Adam is "one of a kind." Adam is also close to God, in fact God is the very breath that Adam breathes. Imagine this: every breath you take in is God, flowing through your body, animating every cell you have with life. It is a powerful image, and represents the reality that we share as inheritors of the Adamic life, that God is the ground of our very being.

Adam represents something new, and something new is always exciting and unusual at the same time. It appears that Adam feels a bit overwhelmed by all this, and does not know quite what to do. Adam attempts to find a help mate among the animals(as if to say "someone help me figure this out!"). All are unsuitable because they are not living souls, like him. God decides to surprise Adam by performing an operation, removing one of Adam's ribs, and creating a helpmate. Adam is pleased for the helper is the same as him, bone of Adam's bones, and flesh of Adam's flesh. Adam, being of dual nature, (body and spirit) could never be happy alone. As a result, Adam is given the one who will be called Eve. The two appear to be quite happy and content, living in the paradise of Eden, completely connected to the God who created them. They are complementaries, the yin and yang, one flesh existing in two distinct natures. Creation is in balance.

To Be or Not to Be

The two trees represent the two aspects of the human soul: mind and spirit. Both are very closely related, and they are meant to be complimentary, not exclusive. The tree of life represents unlimited human potential, when mind and spirit are united and working in harmony with truth(in the story truth is identifed with God and God's law). When Adam and Eve are eating only of the tree of life, their mind is in line with their spirit, and there are no conflicts. They are in harmony with nature, and exist in a realm that is truly beyond good and evil. This is represented by the fact that they did not know they were naked(they had no shame, because there was nothing to shame them). In fact, in this realm, good and evil do not exist because there is only one way; the way of life, unity, and completion without end. The tree of life in the story is completely available to Adam and Eve, and God places no warning or limitaiton on it because it represents the perfect union of the human being, body, mind, and soul with the mind and spirit of God. In such a relationship, there can be no limitations, only infinite growth and potential, or life without end.

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil represents the separation of mind and spirit, with human reason taking the prominent position. If Adam and Eve eat the fruit of this tree (and we know that they do) then they will place their own capacity to think and reason above any other law, or any god. The only truth they will honor is whatever they decide is true for them, and therefore they will create their own reality. They will in effect become gods who know,( knowledge in this sense is experiential) and decide what is good and evil. Through reason they will emancipate themselves from having to be dependent upon a truth greater than themselves. They will become Nietzschean superhumans.

In Beyond Good and Evil, Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future (Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Vorspiel einer Philosophie der Zukunft, 1886), Nietzsche identified imagination, self-assertion, danger, originality and the "creation of values" as qualities of genuine philosophers, as opposed to incidental characters who engage in dusty scholarship. Nietzsche also took aim at some of the world's great philosophers's key presuppositions, who grounded their outlooks wholeheartedly upon concepts such as "self-consciousness," "free will," and "either/or" bipolar thinking. Alternatively, Nietzsche philosophizes from "the perspective of life" which he regards as "beyond good and evil," and challenges the deeply-entrenched moral idea that exploitation, domination, injury to the weak, destruction and appropriation are universally objectionable behaviors. Above all, Nietzsche believes that living things aim to discharge their strength and express their "will to power" -- a pouring-out of expansive energy which, quite naturally, can entail danger, pain, lies, deception and masks. As he views things from the perspective of life, he further denies that there is a universal morality applicable indiscriminately to all human beings, and instead designates a series of moralities in an order of rank ranging from the noble to the plebeian: some moralities are more appropriate for dominating and leading social roles; some are more suitable for subordinate roles. So what counts as a preferable and legitimate action depends upon the kind of person one is. The deciding factor is whether one is strong, healthy, powerful and overflowing with ascending life, or whether one is weak, sick and on the decline.

How tempting to be free to make the rules that govern one's existence! How liberaitng to be the master of your own destiny! I wonder if Adam and Eve thought that the result of their error would be the emergence of a creature who would (as Nietzche states) discharge their strength and exert their will to power? Unfortunately, that is the very demon that will be born when and if Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit.

Apple Anyone?

Those familiar with the story (and who is not?) know that Adam and Eve were tempted by the serpent and ate the fruit they were commanded not to eat; the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Thus sin enters the world. And sin is not simply the breaking of some arbitary divine command. Sin is the desire to want to be like God, because as the story tells us, Adam and Eve were tempted by the serpent with the promise that if they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree they would be like gods, knowing both good and evil. Adam and Eve were tempted by absolute power. And as explained above, the complete separation of human reason from human spirit, enthrones human reason as the ultimate law in the universe. However, there is a price for the attainment of this new found power. The connection of human reason and spirit, and their further connection to God, symbolized by the tree of life, has been irrevocably broken, and can never be put right again (unless God decides to do it). True, a new creature has been born who proclaims the death of God and the birth of the Nietzschean Superhuman. However, this superhuman is not super at all, but impotent, lost, and full of shame and regret. The Adamic life no longer exists. The garden has been abandoned, and the way back guarded by a flaming sword. In the brave new world of emancipated human reason, it is only those that seek and gain power who matter, for they get to enforce their will to power. The powerless are simply genetic rejects who can be used or abandonded depending on the will and whim of the powerful. God and truth are still there but have gone silent, and can only be heard in the lives and struggles of the powerless, the downtrodden, and the outcast. And it is this struggle, between that din of the powerful and silence of the powerless that God will "fix" our error. And it is here that we see the message for our time as well.

Emancipated Human Reason and the Final Battle Between The Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil

Emancipated human reason must be at odds with God, (however one concieves of God), because the concept of a God implies a transcendant force which is greater than, and perhaps even the source of, human reason and will to power. In fact, emancipated human reason cannot exist in the same universe with anything greater than itself, so it is therefore by nature in competition with God. Emancipated human reason is also in competition with all other human beings because each human has enshrined his or her reason as the ultimate judge of right and wrong in the universe. I do not need to detail the problems and conflicts that are caused in human society because of this fact, nor the psychological disorders which arise when people realize their reason is actually quite limited, and they are incapable of answering and coping with difficulties in life. I believe everyone is familiar with many examples. However, even though there are numerous examples of the personal and societal damage caused by the separation of human reason and spirit, the world goes on as it always has, attempting to construct the Tower of Babel and storm heaven, removing God their enemy and rival from the picture, and finishing the work of Adam and Eve. An entire belief system, which goes by many names but is often associated with the occult or Satanism, has developed around the emancipation of the human mind, the denial of divine truth, and the exaltation of man over God. An example of this can be found in the beliefs and practices of the founder of the Church of Satan, Anton LaVey:

http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/satanism/churchof.html
Beliefs
The Church of Satan can best be described as a religion that mixes a hedonistic philosophy with the rituals of black magic. The Church of Satan does not promote the belief of Satan as a supernatural being; rather, it uses Satan as a symbol of defiance and rebellion against a conformist, God-fearing society. However, LaVey felt that it was necessary to build a church in the religious sense because he believed that humans still needed rituals and symbolic worship to reach a deeper level of meaning. In his own words, "People need ritual, with symbols that they may find in baseball games or church services or wars, as vehicles for expending emotions they can't release or even understand on their own"
5 .
There are 9 satanic statements
6 which convey the beliefs of the Church of Satan:
Satan represents indulgence, instead of abstinence!
Satan represents vital existence, instead of spiritual pipe dreams!
Satan represents undefiled wisdom, instead of hypocritical self-deceit!
Satan represents kindness to those that deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates!
Satan represents vengeance, instead of turning the other cheek!
Satan represents responsibility to the responsible, instead of concern for psychic vampires!
Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, often worse than those that walk on all fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all!
Satan represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification!
Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years!
The Church of Satan proposes that emotions such as greed, lust, and hatred are natural instincts and the denial of these feelings is utterly incorrect. They point out the hypocrisy that stems from people worshipping laws that they can't possibly follow, then feeling better again once they have confessed their sins and repented. Members would descibe themselves not as beings full of hatred and sin, but normal people who have come to grips with the carnal nature of humanity.
Yet the Church of Satan also uses much spiritual ritual and symbolism in their meetings. There are three main types of magic ritual employed: sexual rituals to aid in attaining physical ecstasy, compassionate rituals to help loved ones, and destructive rituals to release anger and hatred. Some ceremonies include the use of symbolic elements such as music (organs, gongs, vocalizing), costume (hooded robes, masks), candles, pentograms, and female nudity. A much used symbol is the Sigil of Baphomet, which is an point-down pentogram in a circle, with a goat's head inside the pentogram. The Sigil of Baphomet and closely related symbols have long been used in satanic tradition.
The Church makes a point of keeping a clean public image and steering away from unlawful activities. Following the Church's formula of "nine parts respectability to one part outrageousness," the Church of Satan has discouraged illegal activites, and has even banished grottoes associated with unethical or illegal behavior. LaVey also strongly discouraged the use of illegal drugs, not only for legal issues, but because they cause people to lose control over their lives. Church membership consists largely of respectible citizens in their middle ages, as opposed to the wayward teens that are often characterized as Satanists in the media
.

The Brave New World of the emanicpated human mind is a world of selfishness, competition, vengence, fear, lust, and the dominance of the weak by the strong. It is the world as a police state. The world of emancipated human freedom means freedom for the few, for the gods among us who can handle the burden of freedom. In the words of the Grand Inquisitor(speaking to Jesus): http://www.tameri.com/csw/exist/dostgi.html

"Thou wouldst go into the world, and art going with empty hands, with some promise of freedom which men in their simplicity and their natural unruliness cannot even understand, which they fear and dread -- for nothing has ever been more insupportable for a man and a human society than freedom. But seest Thou these stones in this parched and barren wilderness? Turn them into bread, and mankind will run after Thee like a flock of sheep, grateful and obedient, though for ever trembling, lest Thou withdraw Thy hand and deny them Thy bread." But Thou wouldst not deprive man of freedom and didst reject the offer, thinking, what is that freedom worth if obedience is bought with bread? Thou didst reply that man lives not by bread alone. But dost Thou know that for the sake of that earthly bread the spirit of the earth will rise up against Thee and will strive with Thee and overcome Thee, and all will follow him, crying, "Who can compare with this beast? He has given us fire from heaven!" Dost Thou know that the ages will pass, and humanity will proclaim by the lips of their sages that there is no crime, and therefore no sin; there is only hunger? "Feed men, and then ask of them virtue!" that's what they'll write on the banner, which they will raise against Thee, and with which they will destroy Thy temple. Where Thy temple stood will rise a new building; the terrible tower of Babel will be built again, and though, like the one of old, it will not be finished, yet Thou mightest have prevented that new tower and have cut short the sufferings of men for a thousand years; for they will come back to us after a thousand years of agony with their tower. They will seek us again, hidden underground in the catacombs, for we shall be again persecuted and tortured. They will find us and cry to us, "Feed us, for those who have promised us fire from heaven haven't given it!" And then we shall finish building their tower, for he finishes the building who feeds them. And we alone shall feed them in Thy name, declaring falsely that it is in Thy name. Oh, never, never can they feed themselves without us! No science will give them bread so long as they remain free. In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." They will understand themselves, at last, that freedom and bread enough for all are inconceivable together, for never, never will they be able to share between them! They will be convinced, too, that they can never be free, for they are weak, vicious, worthless, and rebellious. Thou didst promise them the bread of Heaven, but, I repeat again, can it compare with earthly bread in the eyes of the weak, ever sinful and ignoble race of man? And if for the sake of the bread of Heaven thousands shall follow Thee, what is to become of the millions and tens of thousands of millions of creatures who will not have the strength to forego the earthly bread for the sake of the heavenly? Or dost Thou care only for the tens of thousands of the great and strong, while the millions, numerous as the sands of the sea, who are weak but love Thee, must exist only for the sake of the great and strong? No, we care for the weak too. They are sinful and rebellious, but in the end they too will become obedient. They will marvel at us and look on us as gods, because we are ready to endure the freedom which they have found so dreadful and to rule over them -- so awful it will seem to them to be free. But we shall tell them that we are Thy servants and rule them in Thy name. We shall deceive them again, for we will not let Thee come to us again. That deception will be our suffering, for we shall be forced to lie.

Opposed to this hell on earth is the concept of the Kingdom of God. Jesus said that it would be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter God's Kingdom. And we can see why. Riches and power only serve to "feed" the disunity caused by the emancipation and enshrinment of human reason above spirit and truth. Riches, wealth, and power divide humans into the camps of "worthy" and "unworthy" because the new human created at the fall must put people into categories so that the gods of wealth and power can keep their position in life. In response, Jesus commands the rich young man to sell all he has and give it to the poor. Why? Because the strength of this world is really weakness: competition, will to power, riches, fame, empires, etc. are all a manifestaiton of the impotence of fallen humanity. Since the world created is built not on truth, but instead on rebellion, it can only end in disaster, and with the destruciton of all human life. This is the paradox of the nuclear bomb: all nations want it to protect themselves, but to use these weapons would mean destruciton on such a scale that no one would survive. God offers us truth, the truth that perceived weakness (such as poverty, being unpopular, mercy and compassion, non-violence) are actually strengths because they are roads to returning humanity to the garden, and access to the tree of life. However, humanity is incapable of accepting the truth of God and denying the falshood of emanicapted reason. Human reason is fundamentally unreasonable. As a result, the destruciton of this man made hell on earth will only come through struggle. The new tree of life is the cross, and it is only through crucifixion that we can experience the reurrection to new life in the Kingdom of God.

We see the beginning of this final struggle today between those who want to establish world peace through violence, increased state and church authority, and mind control with the truth of God which asks us to freely trust in His Word that God will be victorious. Since the garden this struggle has been on going. Today, we may be begining to see it culmination.

Saturday, March 04, 2006

Gogi

According to many reputable sources, the US is preparing, with help from NATO, Turkey, Israel, and a coalition of Arab States to attack Iran with both conventional and nuclear weapons. For details on the possible war plans, the following link is both enlightening and frightening http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060217&articleId=1988. However, my purpose in bringing this information to light is that something really strange hit me as I was reading about the possible attack on Iran and the coalition that is forming: the nations being put together sound like the coalition from Ezekiel's prophecy regarding Gog and Magog. What is the prophecy of GOG and MAGOG you ask?

The prophecy of Gog and Magog is found in the Book of Ezekiel, chapters 38 and 39 and deals with a final battle between the God of Israel and a personage named GOG, who is a leader from the country or region of Magog. One of the interesting things about this prophecy is that GOG is never refererd to as a king: in fact a closer scrutiny of the original Hebrew presents GOG as the leader, Prince, or even President of Magog, (but more on this later). It is a prophecy that has long fascinated me because it is so mysterious. Who is this Gog? How is he able to summon all the powers of the world (represented by kingdoms in the South, North, East, and West) to descend upon Israel to destroy her? And, why would he want to? Recent events are bringing these questions into sharper focus.


To begin, however, lets take a look at Ezekiel 38 and see what he has to say about GOG:

Thus the word of the LORD came to me:
2
2 Son of man, turn toward Gog (of the land of Magog), the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him:
3
Thus says the Lord GOD: See! I am coming at you, Gog, chief prince of Meshech and Tubal.
4
I will lead you forth with all your army, horses and riders all handsomely outfitted, a great horde with bucklers and shields, all of them carrying swords:
5
Persia, Cush, and Put with them (all with shields and helmets),
6
Gomer with all its troops, Beth-togarmah from the recesses of the north with all its troops, many peoples with you.
7
Prepare yourself, be ready, you and all your horde assembled about you, and be at my disposal.
8
After many days you will be mustered (in the last years you will come) against a nation which has survived the sword, which has been assembled from many peoples (on the mountains of Israel which were long a ruin), which has been brought forth from among the peoples and all of whom now dwell in security.
9
You shall come up like a sudden storm, advancing like a cloud to cover the earth, you and all your troops and the many peoples with you.
10
Thus says the Lord GOD: At that time thoughts shall arise in your mind, and you shall devise an evil scheme:
11
"I will go up against a land of open villages and attack the peaceful people who are living in security, all of them living without walls, having neither bars nor gates,
12
3 to plunder and pillage, turning my hand against the ruins that were repeopled and against a people gathered from the nations, a people concerned with cattle and goods, who dwell at the navel of the earth."
13
Sheba and Dedan, the merchants of Tarshish and all her young lions shall ask you: "Is it for plunder that you have come? Is it for pillage that you have summoned your horde, to carry off silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to seize much plunder?"
17
Thus says the Lord GOD: It is of you that I spoke in ancient times through my servants, the prophets of Israel, who prophesied in those days that I would bring you against them.
18
But on that day, the day when Gog invades the land of Israel, says the Lord GOD, my fury shall be aroused. In my anger
19
and in my jealousy, in my fiery wrath, I swear: On that day there shall be a great shaking upon the land of Israel.
20
Before me shall tremble the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, the beasts of the field and all the reptiles that crawl upon the ground, and all men who are on the land. Mountains shall be overturned, and cliffs shall tumble, and every wall shall fall to the ground.
21
Against him I will summon every terror, says the Lord GOD, every man's sword against his brother. I will hold judgment with him in pestilence and bloodshed;
22
flooding rain and hailstones, fire and brimstone, I will rain upon him, upon his troops, and upon the many peoples with him.
23
I will prove my greatness and holiness and make myself known in the sight of many nations; thus they shall know that I am the LORD.
14
Therefore prophesy, son of man, and say to Gog: Thus says the Lord GOD: When my people Israel are dwelling in security, will you not bestir yourself
15
and come from your home in the recesses of the north, you and many peoples with you, all mounted on horses, a great horde and a mighty army?
16
You shall come up against my people Israel like a cloud covering the land. In the last days I will bring you against my land, that the nations may know of me, when in their sight I prove my holiness through you, O Gog.

Ezekiel states that this war between GOG and the God of Israel will take place in the last days. However, how can we know when the last days are? Ezekiel leaves us some clues:
8
After many days you will be mustered (in the last years you will come) against a nation which has survived the sword, which has been assembled from many peoples (on the mountains of Israel which were long a ruin), which has been brought forth from among the peoples and all of whom now dwell in security.

GOG will come against Israel in a time period when the nation is completely restablished in the traditional Jewish homeland (Canaan)after a long period of separation. Also, the people will live in relative peace (Israel has never been seriously attacked int he modern era by any other regional power, and when it was victory was ridiculously easy). And, there will be a massive migration of Jews from around the world who will want to return to their anscestoral homeland in peace. (For more information on Jewish immigration, refer to the following reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Palestine_and_Israel)

In the time of Ezekiel, Israel was not an independent state, it was a suzerainty of Babylon, and was in the process of being utterly destroyed because of the foolish rebellions of its puppet kings. So Ezekiel could not be referring to his time. Israel was restored later under the Persian Emperor Darius, however the nation of Israel never fully formed, and the land was never fully repopulated. In addition, after Persia, Greece took control of the region and after that, Rome, who oversaw the complete destruction and deportation of the Jewish people. The only time period that appears to fit is ours, because in 1948, the modern State of Israel was established by survivors of WWII and the sword of the Nazi Holocaust, (on the mountains of Israel which were long a ruin) after almost 2000 years!

In sum, Ezekiel tells us that the war of Gog will happen some time after the re-establishment of the State of Israel after a long period of exile, during a time when it is enjoying relative peace, and living in towns without walls. This seems to be our time.



But, if the war is likely to happen in our time, then who is the one (GOG) who will start it?



The Table of Nations

(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yajuj_and_Majuj)

To figure out who Gog from Magog may be, it is important to find out who the Bible says he is and work from there. Gog and Magog first appear in the "Table of Nations" in Genesis 10, where Magog is the eponymous ancestor of a people or nation (without any accompanying apocalyptic symbolism, or mention of Gog):
2. The sons of Japheth were Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras
3. The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah.

Clearly in Genesis these patricarchs are presented as individual people, where Ezekiel is presenting them as a nation, except for Gog himself. And they are mostly the sons of Japheth, who is considered the father of most of the Indo-European peoples. So Gog is likely a person of European descent, possibly of Celtic or Germanic anscestory. This leaves out the nations of the East and Middle East as possible homes for Gog. Gog is not an Arab or Asian leader.

However, that still leaves us with the question: which person of European descent could represent Gog? Ezekiel leaves us another clue.

The clue goes as follows:

Son of man, set your face toward Gog, [toward] the land of Magog, the prince, the head of Meshech and Tubal.

Ezekiel deliberately identifies Gog as the head, or prince of Meshech and Tubal. So, if we want to know who Gog is, then we need to know who the head or protector of these people are today.

Meshech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Meshechs (Meshekhs/Mosokhs/Mushki, Mushku in Akkadian, Moschoi in Greek) were an ancient Indo-European tribe of Asia Minor of the 2nd-1st millennia BC, said in the Bible to be the offspring of Meshech, son of Japheth. They were among the first people to introduce iron smelting there at the end of the 2nd millennium BC.
They occupied a territory somewhere to the south of present-day
Georgia, possibly in Cappadocia. The tribal name Meshech is believed to be the source of Meskheti, the name of a south-western Georgian province. Some historians claim Meshechs being one of the ancestor tribes of modern Georgian people.

So many of the people of Meshech inhabit the former Soviet Republic of Georgia today. However, the leader of Georgia was Russia, but is no longer. Do you know who the new "leader" of Georgia is?

Post-Soviet Georgia welcomes George W. Bush with open arms
02.05.2005
Source:
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/world/ussr/8168-georgia-0

George W. Bush's visit to the republic of Georgia has a political motive, a signal to the Russian administration
A lot of observers regard the forthcoming visit of the US President George W. Bush to the former Soviet republic of Georgia on May 10th as “the visit of an inspector.” Mikhail Saakashvili, the President of Georgia, is believed to be the USA's protege at this point. The USA has been providing quite significant funds to the young Georgian administration after Georgia became an independent state: about $100 million a year. Furthermore, the US government assigned additional $120 million to Georgia during the recent three years for the republic's military programs.
The authorities of Tbilisi, the Georgian capital, started preparing to George W. Bush's upcoming visit last week. Huge billboards saying “Welcome, President George Bush” appeared on city's major highways. The billboards depict Georgian and American flags with the inscription in the Georgian language: “President Bush will deliver speech on the Square of Freedom on May 10th at 9 a.m.”
According to the information from specially-established headquarters for the organization of US president's visit to Georgia, there will be about 100 street signs erected in Tbilisi and other cities of the republic. The cost of each sign is evaluated at about $220. Thousands of Georgian schoolchildren with Georgian and American flags in their hands will be welcoming George Bush on his way from the airport. The city authorities are currently taking urgent measures to improve the outward appearance of the city, repairing roads and painting buildings in all colors of the rainbow. The buildings in the center of Tbilisi are still in scaffolding. President Mikhail Saakashvili personally controls the preparations to the visit of the American guest. Municipal services are repairing the building of the parliament as well, on which they assigned $45 thousand.
Practically all analysts believe that George W. Bush's visit to the republic of Georgia has a political motive, a signal to the Russian administration. The Georgian government apparently wants their Russian colleagues to understand that Georgia is not going to stay alone with Russia.
Shalva Natelashvili, the leader of the opposition Labor Party in Georgia, said that the opposition was going to organize a meeting of protest during Mr. Bush's visit to the republic, protesting against the dictatorship of the Georgian President Saakashvili. The head of the Georgian Internal Affairs Ministry stated in return that all unauthorized rallies would be subdued.
The new Georgian administration is trying to improve its tense relations with Russia. The President of Georgia, Mikhail Saakashvili, has recently stated that Georgia was ready to remove the visa entry for Russian citizens. According to Saakashvili, it will become one of the key issues in the talks with Russian officials. It is noteworthy that Georgia has recently canceled the visa-entry order for US, Canadian, Japanese, Israeli and European citizens, most likely for tourist reasons.
© 1999-2006. «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of PRAVDA.Ru's editors.


Wednesday, May 11, 2005

George Bush calls Georgia ‘beacon of liberty’
* Says Russia will benefit from democratic change in ex-Soviet Union

TBILISI: US President George W Bush on Tuesday saluted Georgia’s fledgling democracy as a “beacon of liberty” and backed efforts by the ex-Soviet republic to regain sovereignty peacefully over two pro-Moscow separatist regions. But, during a 19-hour visit in which he was acclaimed by cheering crowds, Bush significantly avoided open backing for his host, President Mikhail Saakashvili, in his demand for the speedy closure of two Russian bases on Georgia soil. “The path of freedom you have chosen is not easy. But you will not travel it alone,” Bush told at least 60,000 people at Freedom Square, focus of a “Rose Revolution” that installed Saakashvili’s pro-Western government almost 18 months ago. The crowd, squeezed into the square and flowing beyond it, responded enthusiastically to the first visit by a sitting US president to the mountainous Caucasus state. Groups of people sat behind the podium wearing red, white and blue outfits to form the US flag and the red-and-white Georgian banner as Bush recalled Georgia’s long independence struggle that led to its “people’s power” revolution. “You gathered here armed with nothing but roses and the power of your convictions, and you claimed your liberty. And because you acted, Georgia is today both sovereign and free and a beacon of liberty for this region and the world,” Bush said. He said Washington encouraged Georgia’s closer cooperation with NATO, something Russia finds uncomfortable for a country in its own backyard and which it once ruled. And, in what appeared to be a swipe at Kremlin support for the two rebel Georgian regions, Bush said: “The territory and sovereignty of Georgia must be respected by all nations.”

Hmm, America seems to be replacing Russia as the "head or leader" of the Republic of Georgia. The plot thickens.

How about Tubal? What do we find out about the modern descendants of Tubal?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See also
Tabal.
Tubal, according to
Book of Genesis chap. 10 (the Table of Nations), was the name of a son of Japheth, son of Noah.
The
Book of Genesis (chap. 10) gives us the descendants of Noah's three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. We are told that the sons of Japheth were Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras.
Many authors, following the Romanized Jewish author
Josephus (1st century AD), related the name to Iber. Concerning the question of the ethnic affinity of the population of Tubal, Josephus wrote: "Tobal gave rise to the Thobeles, who are now called Iberes". This version was repeated by Patriarch Eustathius of Antioch, Bishop Theodoret, and others. However, the Welsh historian Nennius stated another tradition that Tubal was ancestor to the Iberians, 'Italians' [i.e., Italic tribes] and 'Spanish' [who were also called Iberians].
Basque intellectuals like
Poza (16th century) have named Tubal as the ancestor of Basques, and by extension, the Iberians. The French Basque author Augustin Chaho (19th century) published The Legend of Aitor, asserting that the common patriarch of the Basques was Aitor, a descendent of Tubal.
The
Caucasian Iberians were relatives of modern Georgians. Some modern Georgians also claim descent from Tubal and Meshech. One of the greatest Georgian historians of the 20th century, Ivane Javakhishvili, considered Tabal, Tubal, Jabal and Jubal to be ancient Georgian tribal designations.
The
Tabali (Tibarenoi in Greek) were Luwian tribes of Asia Minor of the 3rd-1st millennias BC. They and other related tribes, the Chalybes (Khalib/Khaldi) and the Mossynoeci (Mossynoikoi in Greek), are sometimes considered the founders of metallurgy.

Again, who is the "protector" or leader of the Iberians (Spanish), the Italians, and the Georgians? America.

Here is an excerpt on an article regarding the ancient biblical view of race:
(Source: http://www.osterholm.info/man/)
The Biblical viewpoint is that there is not a black race, white race, yellow race, etc. Instead, there are three distinct families or characteristics of man that make up the oldest Table of Nations in existence, which is a completely authentic statement of how the present world population originated and spread after the flood, as recorded in Genesis 10 of the Bible (a historical document itself). Here we learn the true divisions of mankind, indicating how the present population of the world came to be. Note that Acts 17:26 states, "He made from one blood all nations who live on the earth. He set the times and places where they should live," a corroboration of Genesis 10.
Genesis chapter 10 shows how the present world population was derived from Noah's three sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth, and their wives (three family groups). Additional references are given in 1 Chronicles chapter 1. Genesis 10 also names 16 grandsons of Noah.
Verse 32 states, "From these the nations spread out over the earth after the flood". These "nations" are the descendants (generations, genealogies or family histories) of the sons of Noah. Chapter 10 describes the differentiation of nations, and asserts that we were all descended from Noah. It is important to understand that people and nations are referred to in a genealogical form (common in Hebrew and other Semitic languages). We find genealogical references in Genesis 10 are firstly to persons or families (ethnological), and secondly to nations or tribes (ethnographical); thus, the chapter ends with an emphasis on nations or tribes, which helps us understand in following chapters where they settled or "spread out over the earth" (geographical). They began as hunter-gatherers and/or pastoral nomads (living off the land as they migrated).
The majority of scholars and Bible historians agree that most of the descendants of Shem stayed in the Middle East. These include the Hebrews, Persians and Assyrians. The descendants of Ham include the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Canaanites, Phoenicians and Hittites. His descendants appear to be the first to fill the earth, as they were the early settlers of Africa, Asia, Australia, the South Pacific, and the Americas. The descendants of Japheth migrated into Europe and parts of Central Asia. The Greeks, Romans, Spanish, Celts, Scythians, and Medes were Japheth's descendants. Some people groups merged to form one nation, as did the Persians (Shem) and the Medes (Japheth), which later became the Medo-Persian empire.


The majority of Gog's army is comprised of the ancestors of the sons of Japeth. Contrast this with the so-called "coalition of the willing" that joined the US in its invasion and occupation of Iraq.


Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan.

Many of the nations of Ezekiel's account are represented and prominent.

The Final Battle

Ok, so it seems that Gog and Magog are likely GW Bush and a coalition of nations that are forming to destroy Israel, or those dedicated to the true worship of the God of Israel. However, since the USA and Israel are allies, how can this be?

Europe has a long history of anti-semitism and hatred for Jews. It is not a stretch to believe that they would conspire with others to destroy them. However, the real reason is simple: Gog wants to destroy the idea of the God of Israel, and set himself up as the only God that can be worshipped. Question: Does GW have tendencies in this direction? Does he see himself as divine, or at the least on a divine mission?

The Archive of Bush's Evil
I asked them the other day, would it be okay if I cut a 30-minute tape, a piece of propaganda, no questions, just here -- here it is, here's 30 minutes of me talking; please run it, not only across your airwaves but run it internationally, if you don't mind; I've got something to say about the conflict and our fight against evil.President George W. Bush - 11/13


It is also a reminder of the great purpose of our great land, and that is to rid this world of evil and terror. The evil ones have roused a might nation, a mighty land. And for however long it takes, I am determined that we will prevail.President George W. Bush - 11/12


Our nations share an urgent mission, which is to stop and defeat terrorism wherever it may exist. That mission is not directed against those who practice Islam. That mission is directed against evil people. President George W. Bush - 11/10


The only thing I know certain about him is that he's evil. And I don't know what to believe about him, except that he wants to hurt Americans. President George W. Bush - 11/10


In a second world war, we learned there is no isolation from evil. We affirmed that some crimes are so terrible they offend humanity, itself. And we resolved that the aggressions and ambitions of the wicked must be opposed early, decisively, and collectively, before they threaten us all. That evil has returned, and that cause is renewed. President George W. Bush - 11/10


We're confident, too, that history has an author who fills time and eternity with his purpose. We know that evil is real, but good will prevail against it. This is the teaching of many faiths, and in that assurance we gain strength for a long journey. President George W. Bush - 11/10


I think there is one universal law, and that's terrorism is evil, and all of us must work to reject evil. Murder is evil, and we must reject murder.President George W. Bush - 11/9


America faces an evil and a determined enemy.President George W. Bush - 11/9


None of us would ever wish the evil that has been done to our country, yet we have learned that out of evil can come great good. President George W. Bush - 11/8


We know that we're fighting evil. And the American people are patient. They've heard the call.President George W. Bush - 11/8


This is an evil man that we're dealing with. And I wouldn't put it past him to develop evil weapons to try to harm civilization as we know it.President George W. Bush - 11/6


Given the means, our enemies would be a threat to every nation and, eventually, to civilization itself. So we're determined to fight this evil, and fight until we're rid of it. We will not wait for the authors of mass murder to gain the weapons of mass destruction. We act now, because we must lift this dark threat from our age and save generations to come.President George W. Bush - 11/6


Our war that we now fight is against terror and evil... Our struggle is going to be long and difficult. But we will prevail. We will win. Good will overcome evil.President George W. Bush - 11/2


We don't share the point of view that evil is religious. We don't appreciate the fact that somebody has tried to hijack a religion in order to justify terror activities. President George W. Bush - 11/2


I don't accept the excuse that poverty promotes evil. That's like saying poor people are evil people. I disagree with that. Osama bin Laden is an evil man. His heart has been so corrupted that he's willing to take innocent life. And we are fighting evil, and we will continue to fight evil, and we will not stop until we defeat evil. President George W. Bush - 11/2


We're also fighting a war overseas, with the purpose of hunting down the evildoers and bringing them to justice. And I'm patient and I'm focused, and I will not yield. We must win.President George W. Bush - 10/31


This is a fabulous nation. The evil ones thought they could affect the spirit of America, but it's had an opposite effect. President George W. Bush - 10/31


The events of these seven weeks have shown something else. They have shown a new generation, your generation, that America and the cause of freedom have determined enemies; that there are people in this world who hate what America stands for. They hate our success, they hate our liberty. We have learned all too suddenly that there are evil people who have no regard for human life, and will do whatever it takes to try to bring this mighty nation to its knees. President George W. Bush - 10/30


One Rwandan journalist wrote in a condolence book at the U.S. Embassy, "We feel and understand what the Americans must be experiencing. The forces of evil must be fought and defeated wherever they are." That's represents exactly the firm resolve of the American people. We will fight and defeat the forces of evil wherever they are.President George W. Bush - 10/29


We are at the beginning of what I view as a very long struggle against evil. We're not fighting a nation; we're not fighting a religion; we're fighting evil. And we have no choice but to prevail. We're fighting people that hates our values, they can't stand what America stands for. And they really don't like the fact that we exist. And I want to assure you all that we will fight this fight on every front. We will use every resource we have. And there is no doubt in my time -- in my mind -- that in our time, we will prevail. There's no doubt. President George W. Bush - 10/29


The press often asks me, well, is this the -- is the evil one hiding from us in Afghanistan, the ones who have done this to America? I said, I don't know. We don't know yet. But we do know the evil one who hides thinks in ways that we can't possibly think in America -- so destructive, such a low regard for human life. And anybody who puts anthrax, trying to kill American citizens, shares the same set of values. Whoever has done it shares that same value of evil that we saw on September the 11th.President George W. Bush - 10/29


Anybody who tries to affect the lives of our good citizens is evil. President George W. Bush - 10/24


We're fighting evil. We don't fight a religion; we fight evil people.President George W. Bush - 10/19


President Jiang and the government stand side by side with the American people as we fight this evil force.President George W. Bush - 10/19


The victims of September 11th were innocent, and this nation will never forget them. The men and women who murdered them were instruments of evil, and they have died in vain.

One last quote, that I think will say it all:
"God told me to strike at al Qaeda and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam [Hussein], which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East(emphasis mine). If you help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them."--Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Abu Mazen quoting Bush when they met in Aqaba; reported in The Haaretz Reporter by Arnon Regular.

Was he asking for help in a future attack on the "problem" of Israel?

Conclusion

As upsetting as it is for me to say, the evidence is strong the the USA and GW Bush are the biblical GOG form Magog. For more on this from a Jewish perspective, you can visit http://www.gogumogog.com/.


Thursday, February 23, 2006

Yesterday, a curious thing happened. From Bloomberg news:
“Feb. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Iraq's Golden Mosque in Samarra, sacred to the nation's Shiites, was badly damaged in a bomb attack that may increase tensions with the Sunni community as the country tries to form a government of national unity.

``The dome of the Golden Mosque sustained catastrophic damage caused by two bombs from inside the building this morning,'' Doug Anderson, a spokesman for the U.S. military in Baghdad, said in a telephone interview today.
The mosque is one of Shia Islam’s holiest sites, housing the remains of Ali al-Hadi, who died in 868 A.D. and his son Hassan al-Askari, who died in 874 A.D. Both were direct descendants of the Prophet Muhammad. Two bombs ripped the dome from the off the top of the mosque.”

There are many reasons why this event strikes me as curious, not the least of which is that it happened on February 22 (from an occult perspective the number 22 is significant), however there are other more “rational” details which I find curious. Take for example this article From the Melbourne Herald Sun:

“Raging militias fuel Iraqi fearsAgencies24feb06
FEARS of all-out civil war gripped Iraq yesterday as more than 50 bullet-riddled bodies were found in the streets of Baghdad.
The killings followed the bombing by suspected al-Qaida linked militants of the 1000-year-old gold-domed Askariya shrine in Samarra, north of Baghdad, on Wednesday.
Three Sunni Muslim clerics were among the dead, as were three journalists for the al-Arabiya satellite television network who had gone to Samarra to report on the bombing and demonstrations that followed.
Elsewhere rampant Shiites, including militia, attacked about 90 Sunni Muslim mosques with bombs, rockets and guns.
There were gun battles in parts of Baghdad and Basra as tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets.
Gunmen loyal to militant Shiite cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr, armed with AK-47 rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, took over streets in his Baghdad stronghold of Sadr City. Sadr blamed Sunni militants for the bombing and vowed revenge.
The US suspects that al-Qaida carried out the attack on the Askariya shrine to drive a new wedge with the Sunni minority and foment religious turmoil.”


Clearly, the attackers had to know that their actions would trigger a civil war, or at the least would spark the possibility of future armed conflicts between the Shia and the Sunni/al-Qaida alliance. It also seems clear that the western media/propoganda machine is playing strongly on the fact that Iraqi Shia militia men believe that Sunni insurgents, with the help of Al-Qaida militants, were responsible for the attack. However, who benefits from such a conflict? Can the Sunni and al-Qaida fight both the Shia and the US? It seems to me that a civil war in Iraq would only further weaken each side and make it less likely that they could ever manage to unite to overthrow the Americans. Therefore, I believe that the real beneficiaries of such a civil war are the US, NATO, and Israel.
Therefore, it seems quite likely that this attack was in fact staged, and it appears to have the fingerprints of the occult all over it. Why would they do it, if they are repsonsible? As a pretext for their war against Iran.
Here are some quotes from our supposed enemy, who smells a rat as well:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has accused Israel and U.S. forces of being behind the attacks: "These heinous acts are committed by a group of Zionists and occupiers that have failed. They have failed in the face of Islam's logic and justice."
** Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "This is a political crime and its origins should be found in the intelligence organisations of the occupiers of Iraq and the Zionists ... There are definitely some plots to force Shi'ites to attack the mosques and other properties respected by the Sunnis. Any measure to contribute to that direction is helping the enemies of Islam and is forbidden by Sharia."


The Iranians know that one of their best strategic weapons against a US led war on their country is the threat of a Shia rebellion in Iraq which would further bog down US forces and create more havoc. However, if the Shia in Iraq are busy in a civil war of vengence, then it further weakens them against the US. Also, if the Shia are engaging the Sunnis and al-Qaida, this would also weaken the Sunni rebellion which must now defend itself against the Shia and the US. Therefore, if there is an attack on Iran anytime soon (and this bombing may be the signal that the attack is coming soon) the US will not likely have to worry about a wider insurgency. In fact, they can let the Iraqis kill each other while they concentrate on killing Iranians.


There are other occult aspects to the bombing which are curious and make me suspicious. Of course, these insights only make sense if you assume that the events happening in the world are the direct result of a groups of esoteric masters called, among other things the illuminati, are in fact behind this war between Islam and the West, and are using it to create a single, fascist world government. I have come to believe that this is in fact the case, and 2006 is the year they will make their move.

First, the bombing happened on February 22. The number 22 is significant to occult practitioners. For example taken from (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/22_(number))

In numerology
The number 22 is significant in many systems of
numerology, often called the Master Builder or Spiritual Master in Form. This 'master number' includes all the attributes of the number 2, twice over, and also those of the 4. People who are 22s are said to find themselves feeling as if they live in two worlds, one which is overwhelmed by the mundane, and the other by the fantastic.
In the traditional
Tarot, there are 22 major arcana cards (numbered 0-21, however, so it is a matter of interpretation whether The Fool or The World is card 22).
It is almost always associated with hard workers, a red-gold colour, and a rose-gold
gemstone.
Interestingly, the
digital root of the 22 is the 4, which is the number of hard work.

In terms of the tarot deck, the number 22 corresponds to both the world card and the fool card. From the same source:
The World (Tarot card)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The World (XXI)
The World (XXI) is a
Major Arcana Tarot card. It is usually the final card of the Major Arcana.
Description
A naked woman or hermaphrodite hovers or dances above the Earth surrounded by a green wreath, being watched by various creatures. In older decks, these are usually a human face or head, a lion, an ox, and an eagle, the symbols of the four
Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. This is a reference to the all-emcompassing knowledge of the Bible, the Word of God. Later decks avoid such blatant Christian symbolism, or ignore it altogether, chosing to explain these observers as representatives of the natural world, or the kingdom of beasts. In some decks the wreath is a basilisk (crowned snake) biting it's own tail - this basilisk is also sometimes called an Ouroborous.
In some decks, this card is also called 'The Universe'.


XXIst card in Tarot of Marseilles

Interpretation
The World represents an ending to a cycle of life. Everything is complete and as it should be. There is a pause in life before the next big cycle - a cycle beginning with the fool. The figure is at once male and female, above and below, suspended between the heavens and the earth. It is completeness.


Interesting that the world card implies that everything is complete and a new cycle is beginning. Perhaps they believe that the “NEW WORLD ORDER” is just around the corner?

The Fool (Zero)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Fool is one of the 78
cards in a Tarot deck. It is part of the major arcana section of the deck.
Symbolism
He is the spirit in search of experience. Many symbols of the Instituted Mysteries are summarized in this card, which reverses, under high warrants, all the confusions that have preceded it.

History
The "
History of the Fool" from The Hermitage tells us that in the decks before Waite-Smith, the Fool is almost always unnumbered. There are a few exceptions: some old decks (including the 15th-century Sola Busca and the Rider Waite) label the card with a "0", and the Belgian Tarot designs label the Fool as "XXII". The Fool is almost always completely apart from the sequence of trumps in the historic decks. Still there is historic precedent for regarding it as the lowest trump and as the highest trump!
In the game of tarot, the Fool has a unique role. Playing the Fool is like momentarily exempting yourself from the rules of the game.


(Hmm, perhaps this fits the MO of Bush, who plays the fool to exempt himself from accountability???)

Interpretation
In his
Manual of Cartomancy, Grand Orient has a curious suggestion of the office of Mystic Fool, as apart of his process in higher divination; but it might call for more than ordinary gifts to put it into operation. We shall see how the card fares according to the common arts of fortune-telling, and it will be an example, to those who can discern, of the fact, otherwise so evident, that the Trumps Major had no place originally in the arts of psychic gambling, when cards are used as the counters and pretexts. Of the circumstances under which this art arose we know, however, very little.
The conventional explanations say that the Fool signifies the flesh, the sensitive life, and by a peculiar satire its subsidiary name was at one time the alchemist, as depicting folly at the most insensate stage.
Although it cannot be seen in all modern cards, The Fool is often walking off a cliff. This raises the question "Is The Fool making a mistake, or is The Fool making a leap of faith?"
Another issue surrounding the fool is "Who is calling him The Fool?"

Mythopoetic approach
Some authorities suggest The Fool is the Hero of the story, and the Major Arcana is the path the Fool takes through the great mysteries of life.
In stories, the fool is often the youngest son or daughter who accomplishes great feats despite the older siblings apparent better position.
Cinderella, Psyche, Cordelia (from King Lear), all the third sons of kings in fairy tales who succeed when their older brothers do not.
The Fool is the Grail Knight who may be destined to locate the Holy Cup, where greater and wiser men have tried and failed.
The Fool is the one teetering at the edge of
Nietzsche’s abyss, at the cusp of dreadful knowledge that will pull him or her out of the cave.
He is the one who takes the fateful step into a new world.
The Fool is
Hamlet before he decides to embrace his destiny.
He has protectors and advisors. There is a dog who appears in most versions of the card. The dog is the natural world. One path to knowledge, and a valuable ally.
When he appears in a spread, he is a signal to strip down to the irreducible core, and interrogate whether The Querant’s self vision is obscured. It may also be a warning that significant change is coming.
Gandhi said once, “If you would swim on the bosom of the ocean of Truth you must reduce yourself to a zero.” The Fool is that Zero who can swim in the deeper waters.


Again, the symbolism is of change, of taking a leap to accomplish something great, something new, something unkown.
Perhaps that is exactly what is happening? Perhaps this bombing was the start of their bold leap of faith, the creation of their perfect society, their NEW WORLD ORDER?

Lastly, here is a passage form the Holy Quran, chapter 22 (which deals with the Al-Hajj, or pilgrimage which just ended with the death of many Eqyptian Arabs) verse 22:
“22. Every time they wish to get away there from, from anguish, they will be forced back therein, and (it will be said), "Taste ye the Chastisement of Burning!"
Perhaps this is a message to all who oppose them. The chastisement that awaits is a nuclear holocaust.
Of course, it is impossible to know for sure. Perhaps time will tell???

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Weapons of Mass Deception

In its rush to war, the Bush administration told us that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and direct ties to Al Queda. This information, coupled with the still smoldering scars of 9-11 and the fear of a possibly even more deadly attack on the horizon, gave them the tacit permission to pursue their illegal war on a defenseless country (Iraq) that had been bombed into submission since 1991. Today, it is common knowledge that they flat out lied, or believed faulty intelligence; either way they presented as facts conclusions that were not true. As a result, the Bush administration has now claimed the real reason for the war was to establish a democratic government smack in the middle of the Arab world. This would create, according to Bush, a democracy domino effect in which people around the world throw off the mantle of their oppressive regimes and embrace the call of liberty and freedom. Why anyone would believe them now after their failure to tell the truth before is hard to say, however in the interest of being fair lets give them the benefit of the doubt. Certainly it is possible now, in the light of Bush’s inaugural speech of 2005, to see the it has become the official policy of this administration to export its version of democracy to the rest of the planet, whether they like it or not. Therefore, lets examine what they possibly mean by such terms, since what they say is often the exact opposite of what they actually mean.

Bush stated in his 2005 inaugural address:

There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment and expose the pretensions of tyrants and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant. And that is the force of human freedom.
We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.

Here we see encapsulated what can be named the Bush Doctrine. Where Monroe’s Doctrine was meant to keep the European Powers out of our Hemisphere, the Bush Doctrine is meant to place America directly into every other hemisphere on the planet. However, I am getting ahead of myself. Lets examine what certain terms the president uses might mean on their own, and what they mean to him and those in power.
First, the president presents freedom as a “force of history” one that is capable of breaking the “reign of hatred and resentment and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant.”
What is freedom? Perhaps John Locke, one of the men whose philosophies the American Revolution was founded on, can offer a definition:

In The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke states his belief that all men exist in "a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and person as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. " (Locke 4) Locke believes that man exists in a state of nature and thus exists in a state of uncontrollable liberty which has only the law of nature to restrict it, which is reason. (Locke 5) However Locke does state that man does not have the license to destroy himself or any other creature in his possession unless a legitimate purpose requires it. Locke emphasizes the ability and opportunity to own and profit from property as being necessary to be free.

Locke disagrees with the president when he says that freedom is a “force of history.” Freedom, for Locke, is a fundamental construct of being human. In other words, for Locke all human beings have been given the power by nature, or God, to be free, regardless of whether they live in a western style democracy or a repressive eastern tyranny. It is not a force of history, it is a human capacity. According to Locke, to be human is to be free, and no one has the power to control it except the individual in the good exercise of his or her own conscience.

Victor Frankl, who was imprisoned by the Nazis in Auschwitz, had this to say about freedom:

Even though conditions such as lack of sleep, insufficient food and various mental stresses may suggest that the inmates were bound to react in certain ways, in the final analysis it becomes clear that the sort of person the prisoner became was the result of an inner decision, and not the result of camp influences alone. Fundamentally, therefore, any man can, even under such circumstances, decide what shall become of him - mentally and spiritually. He may retain his human dignity even in a concentration camp.(emphasis mine) (Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning pp 86-87).

Seems that freedom is not a force at all, but a constitutive dimension of every human being.
So what is this “force of history” that president Bush is referring to? The naked force of American Imperialism. It is clear from Bush’s next sentence that is exactly what he is referring to:

We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in the entire world.

Since freedom cannot be expanded (since everyone has it, and in the same amount), he is of course stating that in order for us to retain what we understand to be a western style democracy, we must “expand” into other countries (by force if necessary) and force them to do as we say. We must, then, aggressively attack other countries and make them like us, or else we will not survive and be free.

Freedom, for Bush, is domination.

At least now he is being honest. The reason they went to war with Iraq was CONQUEST. Many people are appalled and exclaim, “What are they doing in my name?” however if you understand the history of the USA, this sort of thing is simply a continuation of our fine tradition of conquest and racial genocide. They have been doing this in our name for a long, long time.And if you had not noticed, they are using the same lies to create a case for war against Iran. Will we fall for it again? Chances are likely, we already have.

Monday, May 30, 2005

New World Order

The Imperial Presidency of GW BUsh has remained quiet of late, making me curious as to what the next move of Karl Rove is. Lest anyone forget, the machine that drives the BUsh administraiton is Karl Rove, the fanatical genius who delivered the White House to GW by most notably :

1. Using push polls in South Carolina to destroy the reputation of John McCain, and stir up racial fears among the voters (claiming his Bangladeshi daughter was an illegitimate black girl. Wait, was that Strom Thurmond?).

2. Creating an orgnaization called Swift Vote Veterans for truth, and using their hatred for John Kerry's antiwar actvities to spread lies about his war record.

In addition, one can also say that the 9-11 tragedy was used deftly by Rove to move support behind the President during a "time of war." As a result, with the President's approval ratings falling, and with some serious failures in social security, the Schiavo fiasco and the filibuster (amazing-especially with the lap dog dems. One would think they would be able to steam roll their agenda) one would have to assume that something is up. What is their plan?

There can be no denying that the ultimate plan is domination of all international institutions, and the creation of a "Pax American" that is a peace of America in which global peace is based upon the dominance of what George Bush Senior called the New World Order.

What is this New World Order? I would invite those interested to do their research, but it is simply a World Empire, run by a wealthy, unelected elite. So far, it appears to be emerging in the following ways:

1. It is financial. The IMF, World Bank, Cafta, Nafta, etc all of these financial/national organizations have combined to create a world economy. We truly are a global market place, led by the US.

2. It is technological. The internet, sattelites, cell phones, etc connect everyone in the world. It is now possible to electronically monitor and track just about any citizen who wishes to be a part of this global economy. In addition, it is possible to place a chip in a person's skin which will identify them, and perhaps even keep vital financial information on it. Sounds an awful lot like the mark of the beast.

3. It has a propoganda arm. The corporate media conglomerates are enthusiastically selling the idea of a global world order, led by the US and helped along by the emerging EU. Television media especially has become for all intents and purposes propoganda arms of the US government, and the rich elites that control the world economy, and the emerging technological web that will function to control the masses.

4. It is backed up by the US military, and its stockpile of nuclear weapons. Recently the US has changed the rules of engagement to include the right of premptively attackign any country they deem a threat to its National Security now or in the future. ALong this line of reasoning, one could imagine the US launching a nuclear attack against a country that theu felt might have Nukes themselves as a pretext for establishing a single world government to protect the internaitonal financial community and the emerging world empire.

I have a feeling that if they cannot get Iran to play ball, then they are next. The use of a nuke against Iran is a distinct possibility. The US could argue like with Japan, that the Iranians would fight to the death, and this was the only way to save US and Iranian lives. Either way, the reason will not be the war on terror, but instead the estblishment of the New World Order.

Friday, May 13, 2005

Pope Benedict the 16th

What kind of Pope will Benedict the 16th be? Will he be a unifier who revolutionizes, modernizes, and reforms the problems of an aging Church? Will he be a do nothing transitional Pope, as some have claimed he will be because of his advanced age? Or will he be a divider, deepening the chasm between modernity and the Holy See, and further alienating ordinary Catholics from their Mother Church? I suppose that is a question that can only be answered by him, and the answer will of course depend on whether Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger sees the office of the Pope as fundamentally different from the office he previously held as the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. To get a sense of what he might be like as Pope, one can look to his in his previous incarnation as Cardinal Ratzinger. Here is the opinion of The Official Cardinal Ratzinger Fan Club, which is of course favorable:

"From 1981 - 2005, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger was appointed head of the Catholic Church's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, whose mission is to "to promote and safeguard the doctrine on the faith and morals throughout the Catholic world" (John Paul II).
As "Grand Inquisitor" for Mother Rome, Ratzinger kept himself busy in service to the Truth: correcting theological error, silencing dissenting theologians, and stomping down heresy wherever it may rear its ugly head -- and, consequently, had received somewhat of a notorious reputation among the liberal media and 'enlightened' intellegensia of pseudo-Catholic universities.
However, there are those among us who have delved beyond the polemics of his critics, who in familiarizing ourselves with his works have come to admire him both as brilliant Catholic theologian but also as a man whose faith, honesty, integrity, and unswerving devotion to the Truth is readily apparent. "

Below is a record of those who sufferd his devotion to the truth(From NCR online, The Vatican’s enforcer By JOHN L. ALLEN JR. NCR Staff)

"His record includes:
Theologians disciplined, such as Fr. Charles Curran, an American moral theologian who advocates a right to public dissent from official church teaching; Fr. Matthew Fox, an American known for his work on creation spirituality; Sr. Ivone Gebara, a Brazilian whose thinking blends liberation theology with environmental concerns; and Fr. Tissa Balasuriya, a Sri Lankan interested in how Christianity can be expressed through Eastern concepts;
Movements blocked, such as liberation theology and, more recently, religious pluralism (the drive to affirm other religions on their own terms);
Progressive bishops hobbled, including Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen of Seattle, reproached by Rome for his tolerance of ministry to homosexuals and his involvement in progressive political causes, and Bishop Dom Pedro Casaldáliga of Sao Félix, Brazil, criticized for his political engagement beyond the borders of his own diocese;
Episcopal conferences brought to heel on issues such as inclusive language and their own teaching authority;
The borders of infallibility expanded, to include such disparate points as the ban on women’s ordination and the invalidity of ordinations in the Anglican church.
Indeed, it would be difficult to find a Catholic controversy in the past 20 years that did not somehow involve Joseph Ratzinger. Part of that is the nature of the job, but no other 20th-century prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith -- perhaps none ever -- has enjoyed Ratzinger’s high profile or his centrality to the life of the church. He and John Paul are men who believe that ideas count, and Ratzinger has prosecuted what he considers dangerous ideas with vigor. Whether his tactics and ironclad sense of certainty are more dangerous than the ideas he has attempted to suppress is a question that cuts to the core of some of the deepest divisions in the church.
After extensive interviews with leading Catholics, both friends and foes of Ratzinger from the United States and abroad, and after digesting thousands of pages of his writings and writings about him, three key insights about Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger -- Ratzinger the Vatican official, if not the man -- seemed to surface repeatedly:
He sees his work as a defense of human freedom;
He is convinced that he and John Paul are the rightful heirs of Vatican II;
He believes time is on his side.
It’s important to try to understand Ratzinger on his own terms, not merely as a historical exercise, but because believers who see the church as he does -- “Ratzinger Catholics” -- are likely to be a force long after the cardinal himself is gone. "


If for 20 years Ratzinger was intimately involved in doctirnal controversy, and the silencing or scolding of theologians, then one would have to expect that his papacy will not be transitional and subdued. In addition, his papacy will likely not be a unifying one, unless of course one agrees with his positions on a host of non-infallible teachings. The only logical conclusion is that Ratzinger will continue to divide and intimidate in order to establish what he sees as the true Church, a Church dedicated to obedient submission to the Magisterium on all issues. For those of us still in shock about the abuse scandal, and uncertain about the future of the Catholic Church this can only be a sign that the Church we love is in real danger of not surviving.


Mission Statement

According again to the website the Cardinal Ratzinger Fan Club, the following passage is his favorite scripture, and forms a sort of mission statement for Ratzinger's ministerial approach:

"Preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, convince, rebuke and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths. As for you, always be steady, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry. "
St. Paul, 2 Tim 4:2-5

Ratzinger is quoted as saying in his Book, Salt of the Earth,
"I don't want to overreach myself, but I would say that this expresses the essence of what I consider to be my standard at this time." (p. 114).

This is of course very revealing. One can get great insight into what motivates and drives Benedict, and what he sees as his essential mission. And that is to return people to the truth. But what truth? The truth that comes directly and only from Rome, on any issue, whether it be an infallible teaching (the resurrection) or non-infallible (women's ordination, birth control, homosexuality, married priests, etc.). Is this still his mission? The firing of Father Thomas Reese, and the immediate canonization of John Paul II before the 5 year waiting period reveal that he still is. The purge is beginning and I can hear the people leaving the Church already, never to return.